Make the following sentences interrogative and negative: 1.a decided case constitutes a precedent. 2.in his decision the judge has used a process of analogy. 3.the common law was built up by generations of judges. 4.the king exercised his personal power of justice.

1. A decided case doesn't constitute a precedent.

2. In his decision the judge hasn't used a process of analogy.

3. The common law wasn't built up by generations of judges.

4. The King didn't exercise his personal power of justice.

1. Does a decided case constitute a precedent?

2. Has the judge used a process of analogy in his decision?

3. Was the common law built up by generations of judges?

4. Did the King exercise his personal power of justice?