Gulliver's travels
On 5th November, which was the beginning of spammer in those parts, the seamen suddenly saw a rock close to the ship;but the wind was so strong that we were pushed onto it. Six of the crew, including myself, let down the boat into the sea and tried to get away from the ship and the rock. (1)In about half and hour the boat was overturned by a sudden strong wind from the north. What happened to the men in the boat, as well as those who escaped on the rock, or were left in the ship, I cannot say;buy I imagine they were all lost. (2)I often let my legs drop, and could not feel the bottom ;but when I was able to struggle no more, I found myself in shallow waters ;and by this time the storm was much calmer. I walked for nearly a mile before I got to the shore, which I guessed was at about eight o'clock in the evening. I them walked on for another half a mile, but could not find any sign of houses or people. I was extremely tired, and with the heat af the weather I needed to sleep. (3)I slept better than I remembered even having done in my life, and when I awoke, It wos just daylight. I tried to get up, but was not able to for, as I was laid on my back, I found my arms and legs were strongly fastened on each side to the ground ;and my hair,which was long and thick, tied down in the some way. I could only look upwards;the sun began to grow hot, and the lig ht hurt my eyes. (4)In a little time I felt something alive moving on my left leg, which, moving gently forward over my chest, come almost up to my chin;looking downwards as much as I could, I realised it was a human creature not six inches high,With a bow and arrow in his hands.

A.) As for me, I swam, and was pushed forward by the wind and tide.
B.) I lay down on the grass, which was very short and soft.
C.) We rowed about nine miles, till we were able to row no more.
D.) Puzzled, I tried to discover what this strange sound might be.
E.) I heard noise around me;but in the position I was in, I could see nothing but the sky.

"Some people think, that the book - is the best source for knowledge of all aspects of life" 
I disagree with people, who think so. Books - is just one of many tools for the knowledge of being, which has no absolute advantages over other means, such as your own work, communication with intelligent people, lucid dreaming, traveling and so on. I'll just try to guess it what things some people find books dignity; then I'll tell you, what to my mind is the "best source for cognition of all aspects of life"
Books are customary to us, since recent time books have become a traditional way of leisure activities for the masses of people. Almost all the people pay their taxes, and hence they can use public libraries, so bookish education is affordable.
Furthermore, there are variety of written thoughts directions: we can find reflections about eternity in it, and at the same time there are encountered detective stories and cheap novels.That is to say, on the grounds of moral and intellectual development, one can find any answer to his question. 
But the problem consists, that not everyone have the adequate development of creative thinking. That is, not everyone can grasp the whole text of the book in its notional scope; moreover, frequently it's assimilated not what was written in the book, but what was presented by the reader, who, perhaps, can by not quite sober-minded.Thereby it was generated entire sections of ugly information,that  infest the information field and which can't entail nothing good.
In my view, the best method of cognizing life - communication with intelligent, skilled, wise people, let us call them "Elders". Elders can explain everything distinctly, and, noticing that if the information wasn't internalized right, they will rush to explain it again.Their knowledge are always based on practice and never are the result of sick imagination.
Well as a good method of knowledge as cognition yourself in persistent labor. Life starts with one person, thus, it’s reasonable to begin life’s knowledge with the cognition of one person. Labor is a check on durability and viciousness, finding strengths and weaknesses. In sum, with communication with the elders, these two methods are more than replace reading any books.
Of course, books are good, but only as an addition to real activity. Life itself  can be learned only in the process of yourself exploration.

Самое раннее использование аналогичного ?термина? известного автора, датируется в 1918-1920 сроки, когда  США конструктор стрелкового оружия Исаак Льюис разработал ряд экспериментальных автоматов, которые он назвал "Нападение фазовых винтовки". Эти винтовки стреляли в стандартной армии США о вопросе винтовочных припасах в этом период .30 M1906 (.30-06, 7.62x63mm), были в прямой конкуренции с M1918 BAR автоматической винтовки Браунинга Джона. Обе автоматические винтовки Льюиса и Браунинг были разработаны, со схожим понятием как "Гуляющий огонь", которое возникло на французском языке в 1915 году в окрестностях, и впервые реализовано в злополучной CSRG M1915 "Пулемёт Шоша" машинной винтовки. Эта концепция была названа для переносного автоматического оружия с его основным применение в том, чтобы обеспечить подавляющий, поддерживающий огонь для пехоты во время нападений на занятых позиций противника.
На самом деле, это понятие называлось так для винтовки "Нападение", но его ранние реализации, такие как CSRG M1915 и упомянутого выше BAR M1918, или Российской Федоров M1916, имели некоторые недостатки.