We would understand whathad happened that night only later. инверсию

Утверждение:(Вместо пропусков, все остальное оставляем так,как было)
1) are
2) is
3) is
4) are
5) are
6) am
7) are
Отрицание:(Вместо пропусков, все остальное оставляем так,как было)
1) are not
2) is not
3) is not
4) are not
5) are not
6) am not
7) are not
Вопросительное:(Теперь пишем перечисленные ниже перед всем предложением, то есть, переносим "..." в начало предложения, для примера, теперь у нас такая схема: "... the boys brorthers
1) are
2) is
3) is
4) are
5) are
6) am
7) are
Фух, думаю, понятно написал. Возникнут вопросы, пиши

1.The reporter noted there was a serious lack of resources available to us then

2.They admitted the earth was over populated then.

3.Anna said to ride a bike was good for the environment and great for our health.

4.Scientist warn oil spills damage the prime source of water for various cities marine life and even affect birds /Обратите внимание, здесь главное предложение в настоящем.

5.Our teacher explained to us that many chemicals destroyed the ozone layer because they interacted with ozone.

6.A famous ecologist said the use of nuclear energy had led to the threat.

7.The author of the article stated the high amounts of air pollution were caused by the development of several industries and water pollution.

9.I asked myself what the ingredients of these cleaning products were.

Объяснение: